Am 24.09.2006 um 11:52 schrieb Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai: > -On [20060923 14:36], Christian Boos ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >> Now, rather than post-pone all the 0.11 features to 0.12, we could >> think about creating intermediate milestones, 0.11pre1, 0.11pre2 etc. >> which will be "feature" milestones, e.g. 0.11pre1 would be "0.10 + >> genshi", 0.11pre2 would be the integration of WorkFlow, 0.11pre3 >> migration to setuptools, etc. >> >> I think this will improve on the current situation. > > Personally I think this will only add confusion to the entire > ballgame. > > What's against just naming the integration of Genshi 0.11, the > workflow > integration 0.12, the setuptools fixing and whatnot 0.13. Numbers > are cheap > and in this case less confusing than arbitrary suffixes like pre1, > pre2, pre3, > undsoweiter.
Agreed. Undoubtedly the plate is pretty full for 0.11, and it probably makes sense to move some work items to 0.12 or later. This is the list of work items I would personally like to see in 0.11, if we view 0.11 as "The-Migration-to-Genshi-Release": * datetime, because using datetime objects from templates is much nicer and more powerful than getting passed opaque strings and timestamp ints * setuptools, because then you'll be able to easy_install Trac and Genshi will be installed automatically, and also because plugins can finally specify which version of Trac they're compatible with and use the "trac.ext" namespace package instead of polluting the root package namespace * webadmin, because if we keep it separate we may need to maintain two versions (see sandbox/webadmin vs sandbox/webadmin-genshi) I would also really like to see workflow in 0.11. Seeing how it's been worked on quite a bit, updating/polishing the branch and moving it to Genshi should be possible in a relatively short time frame. What I'd also *like* to see in 0.11 is I18N and the refactored Wiki formatting (so that the wiki formatters can take advantage of the streaming in Genshi). However, those efforts haven't even been started yet, so their inclusion is highly unlikely. Cheers, Chris -- Christopher Lenz cmlenz at gmx.de http://www.cmlenz.net/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Development" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
