Christian Boos wrote: *snip* > The datetime branch story is a little bit different, though. > If you look at the actual diffs between that branch and trunk, you'll > see a few things that were not correctly merged so far.
What do you mean by "not correctly merged"? > Also, in the > genshi branch, I already moved the calls to the date rendering utilities > in the templates, so that the data model only contains the timestamps. > Those should be easily converted to datetime objects. So my point is > that the datetime should probably be reworked on top of genshi after the > merge, instead of being simply "svn merge"d. On the datetime branch I on purpose tried to make as few changes as possible, in order to simplify the merge, we can always refactor things later... But I agree that it might be a good idea to merge genshi before datetime since it would probably require less work and as you say, an opportunity to (re)do things "genshi"-style. Cheers, Jonas --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Development" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
