Christian Boos wrote: > Chris Mulligan wrote: > >> ... Here's the full diff I should have had earlier: >> http://trac.edgewall.org/attachment/wiki/AdvancedSearch/trac_whoosh_integration_20090323.diff >> > > Ok, got it working. It searches ;-) > ... > One scenario could > be that we introduce the whoosh search support in say 0.12, and if all > goes well, meaning everybody is happy with the new dependency, we drop > the db fallback search in 0.13. So we replace, but without disruption. > > Starting the way you did by replacing the db search with the new whoosh > search is fine by me. Once it has stabilized, we can make the search > system modular the way I suggested above and re-add the db based search > as a fallback, before integrating in trunk. Er, by the way, are you > interested by a sandbox branch? >
So what about starting a whoosh-search branch, is anyone else interested besides me? -- Christian --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Development" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
