On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Christian Boos <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> Christian Boos wrote:
> > Chris Mulligan wrote:
> >
> >> ... Here's the full diff I should have had earlier:
> >>
> http://trac.edgewall.org/attachment/wiki/AdvancedSearch/trac_whoosh_integration_20090323.diff
> >
> > Ok, got it working. It searches ;-)
> > ...
> > One scenario could
> > be that we introduce the whoosh search support in say 0.12, and if all
> > goes well, meaning everybody is happy with the new dependency, we drop
> > the db fallback search in 0.13. So we replace, but without disruption.
> >
> > Starting the way you did by replacing the db search with the new whoosh
> > search is fine by me. Once it has stabilized, we can make the search
> > system modular the way I suggested above and re-add the db based search
> > as a fallback, before integrating in trunk. Er, by the way, are you
> > interested by a sandbox branch?
> >
>
> So what about starting a whoosh-search branch, is anyone else interested
> besides me?
>
> -- Christian
>


Apparently I never actually sent that draft reply I started back then. I've
done some minor improvements, and would definitely be interested in getting
a branch going.  I don't see any reasonable way to implement this as a
plugin without adding new extension points, which sort of defeats the
purpose.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac 
Development" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/trac-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to