> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
> Behalf Of Christian Boos
> Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2009 10:46 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [Trac-dev] Re: Woosh for search?
>
>
> Christian Boos wrote:
> > Chris Mulligan wrote:
> >
> >> ... Here's the full diff I should have had earlier:
> >>
> http://trac.edgewall.org/attachment/wiki/AdvancedSearch/trac_whoosh_int
> egration_20090323.diff
> >
> > Ok, got it working. It searches ;-)
> > ...
> > One scenario could
> > be that we introduce the whoosh search support in say 0.12, and if
> all
> > goes well, meaning everybody is happy with the new dependency, we
> drop
> > the db fallback search in 0.13. So we replace, but without
> disruption.
> >
> > Starting the way you did by replacing the db search with the new
> whoosh
> > search is fine by me. Once it has stabilized, we can make the search
> > system modular the way I suggested above and re-add the db based
> search
> > as a fallback, before integrating in trunk. Er, by the way, are you
> > interested by a sandbox branch?
> >
>
> So what about starting a whoosh-search branch, is anyone else
> interested
> besides me?
/me makes his usual argument that this should be done as a plugin first and
only talk about doing it in core if people find the plugin useful, but lets
face it, does anyone listen to me when I say that anymore?
--Noah
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac
Development" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/trac-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
