On 6/27/2010 8:59 PM, Noah Kantrowitz wrote:
Also something that was brought up before but not really discussed, Genshi. Do we want to continue trying to improve it or do we undertake another template swap? This might even be too big a thing for 0.13, but if 0.14 is to follow soon after we should probably work out an official stance.
Doing a full template engine migration at once is certainly too big for a single, short duration, milestone. Genshi 0.6 is quite solid however, and apart from the performance issue, the incentive to switch is less pressing now that we have a good release to rely upon. But all what we said before on this topic remains true, see the summary I wrote here http://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/TracDev/ReleaseNotes/0.13#Jinja2Support and in particular the open points we need to address. Experimentation welcome.
-- Christian -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Development" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-dev?hl=en.
