On 1/4/2011 2:58 PM, Dirk Stöcker wrote:
On Tue, 4 Jan 2011, Christian Boos wrote:
So I think we should start by pre-pending:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(edit policy notice)
== Open Source projects using Trac
Start with edgewall.org, trac-hacks.org ;-)
(continue with projects using Trac to the full extent, i.e. wiki +
ticket system + source browser)
(then with projects using Trac partially)
== Companies using Trac
(alphabetical order - no links unless it's a link to a public Trac site)
== Unreviewed
(the current content)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Then, when someone feels like doing a review, "reserve" some links
range by making a quick edit like this:
{{{#!div style="font-size:70%"
//<me> is doing a review of the following links://
(the 20-40 links you're going to review at a time)
}}}
Instead of this could we change the layout?
Making it a table with 3 columns
* project: The project name (linking to project)
* comment: the comment
* last visited: date of last visit(reviwe like 2010-10-03
This allows contributed review and would look much better.
Well yes, this could be done in addition to what I suggested, if this
looks better why not.
However I still think that separating the open source projects from the
companies using private Tracs would be useful. In the first section
"open source", we're free to organize it as we want, placing the
outstanding Tracs first (including those of contributors to the projects
if they want, starting with edgewall.org itself). Whereas in the second
section for companies, a neutral order sounds more appropriate (e.g.
last additions at the end as it is now I believe - easier to maintain
than alphabetical order).
-- Christian
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac
Development" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/trac-dev?hl=en.
