On Wed, 5 Jan 2011, Christian Boos wrote:
I'm not sure if sorting of the Open Source entries is such a good idea (http://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/TracUsers?action=diff&version=894). Manual ordering allowed us to keep related things together, like Sugar Labs and OLPC, numpy and scipy, other Python projects, etc. We can also move closer to the top "exemplar" projects and down those who are not so well tidied (e.g. trac.bevolunteer.org has a lot of ticket spam, it shouldn't come first).
Well, actually I think it is either "no sorting" or alphabetical. To alphabetical sorting the people can adapt, to any other non-obvious rules they will not. Yes, it has drawbacks (like everything in the world), but I still think it is the best solution.
Maybe some very good references can be moved into the top area where currently only the two direct trac projects are?
Ciao -- http://www.dstoecker.eu/ (PGP key available) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Development" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-dev?hl=en.
