Hey hey, Thought I'd answer this little bit:
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 2:44 PM, Ethan Jucovy <[email protected]> wrote: <snip/> > whether the > Apache Foundation's formal guidelines and informal procedures would allow > for a healthy relationship between Apache Bloodhound and an upstream > BSD-licensed Trac sponsored by the SFC <snip/> There wouldn't be any issue from an apache guideline/procedure perspective with that. If the bloodhound contributors were to decide they will just work on/within trac directly if it's an SFC project, then maybe having bloodhound exist at all would stop making sense. Of course I can't decide that for them. But, I can say that from an apache guideline/procedure perspective that also wouldn't be an issue. cheers, Leo -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Development" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-dev?hl=en.
