Ethan Jucovy <[email protected]> writes: > On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Greg Troxel <[email protected]> wrote: > >> inbound=outbound: there is no formal CLA but there's a policy, perhaps >> formal, that states that all code contributions are made under the >> existing license. >> >> I have the impression trac operates in the third mode, but it's not >> clear. >> >> That said, edgewall could assign any copyrights it does hold to SFC. >> > > Thanks. I hadn't realized that Trac's copyright works this way. > > Just to clarify, do you know if this would be a problem for SFC > sponsorship? It looks like Mercurial uses the same distributed copyright > model ( > http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/License#Who_holds_the_Mercurial_copyright.3F) > and is an SFC member project, so it looks like that wouldn't be an issue?
I am quite sure the non-assigned non-CLA inbound=outbound approach is fine with SFC, from having listened to Bradley rant on his Software Freedom Law Show and Free as in Freedom podcasts.
pgporduXkBati.pgp
Description: PGP signature
