Dimitri Maziuk wrote: > Chad Emahizer wrote: >> I think I might be restating a bit here from what others have already said, >> but Trac does (or can do) what you want it to do. It is flexible and >> doesn't force its own "business logic" on its users. It basically has to be >> like that, or it will be targeting only a small portion of the population >> regardless of whichever specific implementation it would choose to >> implement. >> >> A problem with that approach is that not only do you have to learn a new >> tool, but you also have to understand the processes your company has in >> place and then determine ways to configure/utilize Trac to fit in with those >> processes. > ... >> So, maybe the question shouldn't be "How is Trac supposed to be used?". >> Maybe it should be "What are the processes for my company, and how can I >> tailor Trac to enforce those processes and make them easier to do?" > > There are 2 kinds of users: those who want to tweak software to do what > they want, and those who're happy to click on a button and let the > software take them to wherever Bill Jobs (aka Steve Gates) thinks they > want to go. Those in the second category should probably not use trac, > linux, or any "programming languages" other than flash. > > Dima >
Man, you're not supposed to say stuff like that out loud. That's why everyone hates us! --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Users" group. To post to this group, send email to trac-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
