Hello Jamie, On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 5:06 PM, Jamie McCracken < jamie.mccr...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi Natan, > > thanks for the clarity > > > > > > > 1. A high level API that wraps around SPARQL: I do like the option of > > using SPARQL for advanced queries, but right now we don't need that > > much power and it raises the entry bar for new developers. > > > > I believe this is planned. We have discussed having convenience libs to > make things easier. > > > 2. A stable D-BUS API that we can use today. (I'm planning on > > releasing some code that I'm working on before Tracker 0.7 is even > > released.) We can't wait for tracker to add support for tracking > > timestamps and stall all development until then. > > sure > > > > > 3. The ability to quickly write indexers in any language and insert > > new documents into the database over D-BUS: As said above, speed isn't > > that much of a concern at the moment. It definitely makes sense to > > eventually rewrite Python indexers in C to improve the performance, > > but now is not the time for that. Time is a lot more valuable to us > > then speed. > > > > what exactly do you need to index? tracker is well on the way to > indexing all local files, emails, rss feeds. Web services are coming > soon too That's a fair point. I forgot about the GSoC project to bridge web services. > > > if the indexers you want are useful (to nokia) its quite likely they > will fund development in tracker for them > > > jamie > > Natan
_______________________________________________ tracker-list mailing list tracker-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/tracker-list
