On Fri, 2017-03-31 at 00:32 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > You are right, there is indeed an issue with valac and reproducible builds: > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=802528 > > I guess this should be fixed in vala proper though.
nod. > Personally, I'm not a huge fan of shipping pre-generated files in a > dist tarball. As soon you need to patch one of the source files you > need to regenerate it anyway. So it's better to do it always. Hmmrr. Patching .c files generated by valac sounds absurd. Is there ever a circumstance where you want to do that instead of patching the .vapi or .vala file? Because if you do, that sounds like a bug in valac instead. Kind regards, Philip
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ tracker-list mailing list tracker-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/tracker-list
