I wonder if removing those .stamp files should be part of any make-target that is ~ standard for packaging tooling? In my opinion should such generated .c files share the rules of .o files.
On Sun, 2017-04-09 at 19:28 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > 2017-04-09 19:04 GMT+02:00 Philip Van Hoof <phi...@codeminded.be>: > > Correct. Is there anything holding you back from rerunning valac after > > applying a patch during dpkg-buildpackage? > > No, not really. I guess I would just remove the vala.stamp files to > force the regeneration of the .c files. That should be all that's > needed afaics. > >
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ tracker-list mailing list tracker-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/tracker-list
