Hi, 0n 06/05/[EMAIL PROTECTED]:23 Andrew Church told me:
> >I thing everybody would agree that all tools comming form the > >mjpeg-tools (AKA yuv <TAB> <TAB>), produce high-quality results. > > Then you might want to take a look at: > http://www.transcoding.org/cgi-bin/transcode?FFmpeg_Vs._Mpeg2enc THX. Shame on me I didn't know the page :(. As said I am lacking in personal experiances comparing the codecs itsself, but especially the mjpeg-tools toolchain using: yuv[denoise|scaler|deinterlace|medianfilter] are often reported to do a very good job. OTOH they need some fine tuning, where I prefer to have a rundimental "ok for me" transcode line. As dv is already very good quality, these tools are less important for dv -> dvd, IMHO. However, I saw some real astonishing results from people tried to backup there old VHS recordings on DVD. A fine tuned mjpeg-tools toolchain was able to improve the results a lot. -- bye maik
pgpmzWAQM9uC0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
