Maik Holtkamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > > 0n 06/05/[EMAIL PROTECTED]:50 Tomi Ollila told me: > >> Maik Holtkamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > >> > BTW: IMHO there is no need to deinterlace when you transcode dv -> >> > dvd, is it? >> >> My digicam produces interlaced output -- which looks very ugly on computer >> screen (moving parts)-- I quess TV:s (even lcd-ones) do some extra work to >> clean that up but... ... and smartyuv does great work, especially as there >> is no real-time requirements in my encodings that is the way to go. > > Digicam = DV (or some crap like mjpeg + 8bit sound)?
Yes, digital camera with DV tape, 720x576, 16 bit PCM sound (per channel), 48000, 2 channels. (I must have been pretty tired when writing that -- more than average language errors ;/) > > Of course it depends what your major target (monitor|TV screen) you > encode for. > > Normaly my major target is a TV crt and quality is decreased when > the stream was deinterlaced while encoding. Therefore I prefer to > keep interlacing (--encode_fields b). I'm planning for the future when there is no such things as CRT televisions. After summer 2007 here in Finland those are vanishing rapidly when analog TV transmissions are gone (all dvb-T/C/S then) and nobody creates crt-tv:s with digital tuner anymore :D > > If I (rarely) have to play these files on a monitor I use > deinterlacing the player software is offering and it's ok for me. > However, IIRC kino did not come with deinerlacer for long time [1] > and quick sceens looked really ugly in kino. > > [1] Just checked 0.81, which offers deinterlacing. Some years ago I transcoded something with KINO; results was big mpeg2-file with lousy quality. I quess there are options to be tuned and the software has improved, but... ;) > > -- > bye maik Tomi
