Surprised OSH park doesn't already have the footprint on hand... -j On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 1:47 PM Pete Soper <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks again, Josh. I appreciate it. Got to go with the Adafruit huzzah > lib 'cause of time. Actually, I'm in trouble and need somebody(s) good > with Eagle to swing by and help if possible. I was expecting OSH Park to > say I could get it to them tomorrow. Another mistake. > > -Pete > > 919 270 9433 > > > > On 11/15/21 13:39, Josh Wyatt wrote: > > Negative on the eagle, I apologize. > > But I found these: > https://grabcad.com/library/mh-et-esp32-d1-mini-eagle-1 > https://easyeda.com/search?wd=esp+wemos&indextype=components > > Thanks, > Josh > > On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 1:30 PM Pete Soper <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Sorry for the confusion. Do you have an Eagle lib for this? Have to >> upload to OSH Park by 6pm. >> >> THANKS! >> >> Pete >> On 11/15/21 13:21, Josh Wyatt wrote: >> >> The link I shared was for ESP32 boards. What I was trying to convey (and >> maybe was miscommunicated, yay email!) is that these linked ESP32 boards >> seem to follow a form factor and convention of prior/historical ESP8266 >> boards, and therefore bring some additional consistency. I attached a >> screenshot of the page that loads for me, from that Amazon link. >> >> Thanks, >> Josh >> >> On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 1:16 PM Peter Soper <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Thanks very much, Josh. Agree with point about pin conflicts. But did i >>> go to the wrong page? I want to use an esp32 not 8266. This is for the >>> "0.01" versuon of the community project board. >>> >>> Nov 15, 2021 1:11:29 PM Josh Wyatt <[email protected]>: >>> >>> This is sort of an indirect response to your question, but my experience >>> is that the more complex and "featured" the dev board, the less consistent. >>> For example, for boards with onboard 18650 battery holders and Liion >>> charger, OLED display, and even onboard LEDs will be on different I/O >>> ports. So my guidance would be to choose the simplest boards available, >>> which is sort of antithetical to the "dev board" concept. >>> >>> I've had pretty good luck with consistency on the "wemos esp8266 clone" >>> boards, presumably because the Wemos D1 mini became very established with >>> the 8266; search on amazon for "esp32 d1 mini." Here's a link: >>> https://www.amazon.com/Bluetooth-Internet-Development-Functional-Ardu-ino/dp/B08MFCC4SR/?th=1 >>> >>> >>> You mentioned soldering footprint, and that one's not super friendly; >>> but it should be pretty consistent since the design tries to adhere to the >>> original ESP8266 Wemos D1 Mini form factor. >>> >>> You mentioned Amazon specifically, so I assume you're prototyping? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Josh >>> >>> On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 11:38 AM Peter Soper via TriEmbed < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> What esp32 dev board soldering footprint should be used on a board >>>> combining this with other stuff where it has to be 1) obtainable reliably >>>> 2) offer wifi and BT and 3) be cheap? I see many cheap on amazon. Are their >>>> pinouts de facto standard? And finally, anybody got an Eagle lib for this >>>> board? Or could you make and send me an .lbr for it? >>>> Thanks in advance. >>>> Pete >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Triangle, NC Embedded Computing mailing list >>>> >>>> To post message: [email protected] >>>> List info: >>>> http://mail.triembed.org/mailman/listinfo/triembed_triembed.org >>>> TriEmbed web site: http://TriEmbed.org >>>> To unsubscribe, click link and send a blank message: mailto: >>>> [email protected]?subject=unsubscribe >>>> >>>>
_______________________________________________ Triangle, NC Embedded Computing mailing list To post message: [email protected] List info: http://mail.triembed.org/mailman/listinfo/triembed_triembed.org TriEmbed web site: http://TriEmbed.org To unsubscribe, click link and send a blank message: mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
