I think I may be better off making cardboard models  or put energy into a white board for the short term.  A daughter board for a 100 pin device that needs to solder in place with .1" headers involves geometry/mechanical skills where my execution speed is off by orders of magnitude.

-Pete

On 11/15/21 14:40, Pete Soper via TriEmbed wrote:

Don't need help, thanks. The v0.01 board will be what it will be. Was flirting with dropping out of the fun zone but recovered. :-)

-Pete

On 11/15/21 13:47, Pete Soper via TriEmbed wrote:

Thanks again, Josh. I appreciate it. Got to go with the Adafruit huzzah lib 'cause of time. Actually, I'm in trouble and need somebody(s)  good with Eagle to swing by and help if possible. I was expecting OSH Park to say I could get it to them tomorrow. Another mistake.

-Pete

919 270 9433



On 11/15/21 13:39, Josh Wyatt wrote:
Negative on the eagle, I apologize.

But I found these:
https://grabcad.com/library/mh-et-esp32-d1-mini-eagle-1
https://easyeda.com/search?wd=esp+wemos&indextype=components <https://easyeda.com/search?wd=esp+wemos&indextype=components>

Thanks,
Josh

On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 1:30 PM Pete Soper <[email protected]> wrote:

    Sorry for the confusion. Do you have an Eagle lib for this? Have
    to upload to OSH Park by 6pm.

    THANKS!

    Pete

    On 11/15/21 13:21, Josh Wyatt wrote:
    The link I shared was for ESP32 boards. What I was trying to
    convey (and maybe was miscommunicated, yay email!) is that
    these linked ESP32 boards seem to follow a form factor and
    convention of prior/historical ESP8266 boards, and therefore
    bring some additional consistency. I attached a screenshot of
    the page that loads for me, from that Amazon link.

    Thanks,
    Josh

    On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 1:16 PM Peter Soper <[email protected]> wrote:

        Thanks very much, Josh. Agree with point about pin
        conflicts. But did i go to the wrong page? I want to use an
        esp32 not 8266. This is for the "0.01" versuon of the
        community project board.

        Nov 15, 2021 1:11:29 PM Josh Wyatt <[email protected]>:

            This is sort of an indirect response to your question,
            but my experience is that the more complex and
            "featured" the dev board, the less consistent. For
            example, for boards with onboard 18650 battery holders
            and Liion charger, OLED display, and even onboard LEDs
            will be on different I/O ports. So my guidance would be
            to choose the simplest boards available, which is sort
            of antithetical to the "dev board" concept.

            I've had pretty good luck with consistency on the
            "wemos esp8266 clone" boards, presumably because
            the Wemos D1 mini became very established with the
            8266; search on amazon for "esp32 d1 mini." Here's a
            link:
            
https://www.amazon.com/Bluetooth-Internet-Development-Functional-Ardu-ino/dp/B08MFCC4SR/?th=1


            You mentioned soldering footprint, and that one's not
            super friendly; but it should be pretty consistent
            since the design tries to adhere to the original
            ESP8266 Wemos D1 Mini form factor.

            You mentioned Amazon specifically, so I assume you're
            prototyping?

            Thanks,
            Josh

            On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 11:38 AM Peter Soper via
            TriEmbed <[email protected]> wrote:

                What esp32 dev board soldering footprint should be
                used on a board combining this with other stuff
                where it has to be 1) obtainable reliably 2) offer
                wifi and BT and 3) be cheap? I see many cheap on
                amazon. Are their pinouts de facto standard? And
                finally, anybody got an Eagle lib for this board?
                Or could you make and send me an .lbr for it?
                Thanks in advance.
                Pete
                _______________________________________________
                Triangle, NC Embedded Computing mailing list

                To post message: [email protected]
                List info:
                http://mail.triembed.org/mailman/listinfo/triembed_triembed.org

                TriEmbed web site: http://TriEmbed.org
                <http://TriEmbed.org>
                To unsubscribe, click link and send a blank
                message:
                mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe



_______________________________________________
Triangle, NC Embedded Computing mailing list

To post message:[email protected]
List info:http://mail.triembed.org/mailman/listinfo/triembed_triembed.org
TriEmbed web site:http://TriEmbed.org
To unsubscribe, click link and send a blank 
message:mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe


_______________________________________________
Triangle, NC Embedded Computing mailing list

To post message:[email protected]
List info:http://mail.triembed.org/mailman/listinfo/triembed_triembed.org
TriEmbed web site:http://TriEmbed.org
To unsubscribe, click link and send a blank 
message:mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
_______________________________________________
Triangle, NC Embedded Computing mailing list

To post message: [email protected]
List info: http://mail.triembed.org/mailman/listinfo/triembed_triembed.org
TriEmbed web site: http://TriEmbed.org
To unsubscribe, click link and send a blank message: 
mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to