I've thought about this for a while, and I have to disagree now based on a
counterexample. The Mozilla Public License 2.0 grants you no license to
modify the code if it is patented. Yet it has been approved as a free
software license, even though one of your important freedoms can instantly be
taken away with a patent.
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Ubuntu Fonts ... mikko . viinamaki
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Ubuntu Fonts License tegskywalker
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Ubuntu Fonts License ejectmail
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Ubuntu Fonts License onpon4
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Ubuntu Fonts License ejectmail
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Ubuntu Fonts License onpon4
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Ubuntu Fonts Licen... ejectmail
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Ubuntu Fonts ... onpon4
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Ubuntu Fo... ejectmail
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Ubuntu Fo... onpon4
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Ubuntu Fo... ejectmail
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Ubuntu Fo... onpon4
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Ubuntu Fo... ejectmail
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Ubuntu Fo... ejectmail
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Ubuntu Fo... onpon4
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Ubuntu Fonts License ejectmail
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Ubuntu Fonts License wolftune
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Ubuntu Fonts License ejectmail
