Sorry for getting myself in the middle of the conversation, but I do agree
with quantumgravity, specially considering the purpose of Wikipedia, which is
to be an encyclopedia, thus meaning that it should provide the most correct
information they receive to date.
Of course, errors must be accepted, because everyone makes mistakes, but by
being an encyclopedia, and by being available worldwide through the Internet,
Wikipedia must be flexible enough to evaluate the proposed changes, search
about such subjects (again and again, even if they have already found the
answer in the past), and discuss such changes with others.
I just wish the Wikipedia maintainers and evaluators would understand the
meaning of an encyclopedia.
Sorry if I offended someone, I really didn't (and I still don't) want to do
so.
Best regards, ADFENO.
Have a nice day.
