>Every movement has ethics and principles, and it promotes them.
Of course. But nobody can promote illogical principles by means of logics.
You must appeal to emotions. Maybe I missing something, but I can't see this
approach in FSF advocacy. It's like to use a spoon instead of a hammer. It's
ineffective.
>Every animal strives for freedom
REALLY?? O_O How about the whole story of domestication of dogs? If every
animal strives for freedom, then domestication is impossible.
And by the way, how about ants?
>If you believe otherwise ..
I believe otherwise and I don't want to do it. Why? Because I can't see any
benefits in these specific situations. Your argument looks like "If you don't
belive "computers are the higest value in my life" then throw away your
computer right now!".
> free software movement is illogical just like a religion
You got it wrong. Every movement have motivation. But every motivation needs
under-logical basis. For example, there isn't any way to prove need to stay
alive by means of pure logic.
But, if you want to change mind of a person, you must use the same basic
illogical beliefs.
Example:
Person A: "You should care about ecology, otherwise your children would live
in terrible world of devastation"
Person B: "Hurhurhur! I'm a childfree
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Childfree), go away!"