> How is their income relevant?
They are a "non-profit" that accepts money for the corporation. A
"non-profit" that will force your search engine to change depending on their
business deal.
> What references are there for these claims?
If you read the link or watched the YouTube video, Mozilla has the power to
remotely force extensions and that resulted in the Mr. Robot controversy.
> Again, what references back up an alleged forced DRM? And if you're talking
about a Mozilla-hosted discussion forum censoring people, how is that an
issue which would give one cause to stop using their free software?
Mozilla implemented the encrypted media extensions before it was a W3C
standard. They also fired an employee for not agreeing with them 100% and
they also own the RiseUp email site. RiseUp is very inclusive and will kick
you out if you do not follow their strict ideology.
> Such as?
The Chromium browser has been excluded from Trisquel for years due to
inconsistent licensing and Ruben made a decision to exclude it instead of
doing further research or blacklisting the libraries.
