************* The following message is relayed to you by trom@lists.newciv.org ************
In order for me to get back into TROM, I would have to audit out the engrams and GPMs and ARCX that I acquired from TROM and the number of so called people who pretended to be doing well and pretended to be experts in TROM, that pissed me off when I was in deep despair and deep suffering from being stuck in crap and case and needed assistance and didn't get any, other than being told to go and read the archives or something stupid like that.
That could take a year by itself. :) David On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Pete Mclaughlin < pete_mclaughlin_93...@yahoo.com> wrote: > ************* > The following message is relayed to you by trom@lists.newciv.org > ************ > > Hi David > Have you tried reading the kindle version? I would be really pleased if it > helped you understand and apply TROM. > > Sincerely > Pete > > On Feb 3, 2013, at 11:43 AM, David Pelly <david.pe...@gmail.com> wrote: > > ************* > The following message is relayed to you by trom@lists.newciv.org > ************ > > Pete, > > Thank you for the explanation. > > But distinguishing whose words are whose in an editing, is basic literary > integrity or editing integrity. > > And just because Greg and Judith did not do it, does not mean it is the > right thing to do. > > Three wrongs do not make a right. > > You should also include an explanation that TROM went through two > previous edits prior to yours, and that you have no idea of whose words > are whose, if you in deed don't. > > One editing by Greg and another by Judith. > > (But it just occurred to me to ask: are there not tapes for the record?) > > At least Judith, that I know of, became totally pissed off and disdainful > of TROM and gave up. > > That likely gives some indication as to the difficulty of her case and > TROMs inability to help her with her case. > > Similar to my situation. > > It is possible that if she would of been helped by TROM, she might of > acquired some extra free theta units and did more work and did the editing > properly. > > It is difficult to think of much when the biggest issue is the size and > severity of one's case and the desperate need to deal with it. It is a > simple matter of priority. > > > > Like it has been said, when you are up to your ass in alligators it is > hard to think that the main goal is to drain the swamp. > > A person has to come up the tone scale and theta scale to think and > function with full integrity. > > In this case it is literary integrity or editing integrity. > > > > > > I suspect that Greg also became disdainful too. > > I know a number of others who did likewise. > > > David > > > > > On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 1:49 AM, Pete Mclaughlin < > pete_mclaughlin_93...@yahoo.com> wrote: > >> ************* >> The following message is relayed to you by trom@lists.newciv.org >> ************ >> >> >> Hi David >> >> Whose words are whose? An excellent question. >> >> In 1979 Denis gave his notes to Greg Pickering to write TROM. Those notes >> do not exist to check how accurately Greg did the job. >> >> Many people complained that the book was hard to understand and needed an >> index. >> >> Greg quit as the distributor of TROM around 1990 so Dennis turned over >> Australian distribution to Judith Anderson. >> Judith responded to concerns about spelling and grammar errors in TROM by >> editing the text, adding her own interpretation of how to run TROM to the >> end of the Manual as an appendix and who knows what else as no editing >> notes were made and the original 1979 is gone or at least I have never seen >> a copy. >> >> The TROM manual at the Freezone site is the one I started with and is the >> Judith Anderson edition. >> >> So if anyone is serious about getting the original version and verifying >> that none of the tech has been lost you need to contact Greg and get >> Dennis' notes or at least a copy of Greg's original 1979 version of the >> manual. >> >> Thanks for asking David, everyone should be aware of what version of TROM >> they are studying. >> >> Sincerely >> Pete >> On Feb 2, 2013, at 7:19 PM, David Pelly <david.pe...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> ************* >> The following message is relayed to you by trom@lists.newciv.org >> ************ >> >> The right thing to do is to do like Aarre said. >> >> >> >> There has to be some sort of a distinction in whose words are whose. >> >> >> >> David >> >> >> >> >> On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 9:40 PM, Aarre Peltomaa >> <peltomaa.aa...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> ************* >>> The following message is relayed to you by trom@lists.newciv.org >>> ************ >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 9:39 PM, Aarre Peltomaa <peltomaa.aa...@gmail.com >>> > wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Pete, >>>> I still think that a short editing note won't be that much distraction, >>>> and is worth it. Or you could change the font each time you put in an >>>> inclusion. With a reality factor in the beginning explaining the font >>>> change, that wouldn't be too distracting. >>>> What do the others think about this ? >>>> Aarre Peltomaa >>>> >>>> On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Pete Mclaughlin < >>>> pete_mclaughlin_93...@yahoo.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hi Aarre and Roberto >>>>> >>>>> All you need to do to see the changes is open up the kindle version in >>>>> one window and open up the old version in a second window and read them. >>>>> >>>>> Part of my purpose in doing the editing was to eliminate all the >>>>> distractions that the bad grammar imposed on the reader. It would be >>>>> counter productive to now add in the distractions of editing notes. >>>>> >>>>> Sincerely >>>>> Pete >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Jan 31, 2013, at 4:30 PM, Aarre Peltomaa <peltomaa.aa...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> > Hi Pete, >>>>> > I finally got Kindle working and downloaded the manual and your >>>>> additions to my desktop; wonderful ! The fonts and bolded parts are >>>>> easy to read, and large enough type size. It is arranged very nicely. >>>>> The only thing that I can ask at cursory glance is that any additions that >>>>> you put in, such as the charts, be marked as added by you, and not in >>>>> the >>>>> original manual. This way a person will know what was written by Dennis, >>>>> and what was written by you. This annotation should also apply to any >>>>> additional sections, chapters, explanations, etc., that you have added. >>>>> I >>>>> think this is a very important point, and I welcome input from other >>>>> TROMers about this. >>>>> > Thanks very much for this work, >>>>> > Aarre Peltomaa >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Trom mailing list >>> Trom@lists.newciv.org >>> http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Trom mailing list >> Trom@lists.newciv.org >> http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Trom mailing list >> Trom@lists.newciv.org >> http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Trom mailing list > Trom@lists.newciv.org > http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom > > > _______________________________________________ > Trom mailing list > Trom@lists.newciv.org > http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom > >
_______________________________________________ Trom mailing list Trom@lists.newciv.org http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
