************* The following message is relayed to you by trom@lists.newciv.org ************ Didn't know Ron had an IPad. ;-)
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014, at 10:31 AM, Pete Mclaughlin wrote: > ************* > The following message is relayed to you by trom@lists.newciv.org > ************ > > Hi all > Dennis gives details about the E-Meter needle movements but doesn't say > much about high or low Tone Arm readings. Here is the LRH view. > > Keep on TROMing > Pete > > > HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE > Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex > HCO BULLETIN OF 28 JANUARY 1960 > HCO Secs > > Assn Secs > Mission Holders > > THE KEY TO ALL CASES—RESPONSIBILITY > > During the past three months I have made several important discoveries in > the field of the human mind which iron out the bits and pieces that were > getting in our road in making broad clearing programmes possible. > > First of these was the discovery that the tone arm of the E-Meter rather > than the needle was foremost in analyzing the case. When the tone arm > reads at three for males and two for females on the modern meter a > process can be considered flat. > > Aside from various special states such as valence shifts, this will hold > true. When the tone arm reads at clear for the person’s sex no matter > what one attempts to restimulate on the case you have a Clear. > > Additionally the hot areas of the time track are located because they > throw the tone arm to higher or lower readings. > > Good auditing today cannot be done without an E-Meter of good reliable > quality as distributed by HCO WW in the UK and by Wingate Enterprises in > the United States. It could be said that the E-Meter has just now become > an absolute necessity in auditing and general analysis—using the E-Meter > RIGHT we can achieve Clears. > > Next, but not next in importance was the discovery of the anatomy of > RESPONSIBILITY. Although Responsibility has been known as a case factor > since 1951 (just as the overt-motivator sequence has been) it has not > been until now that I have been able to get it to run well on cases. > > Responsibility is a significance. Pcs define it in various ways. And all > rather tend to run from it. > > Pcs in general pretend they would much rather be victims than causative > sources—which is what is wrong with their cases. > > In order to get responsibility to run I had to find out a lot more about > it and not until the very end of 1959 was I able to define it in any way > that made it run and come into being on a case. > > Now I mentioned the E-Meter first in this because it is > RESPONSIBILITY—LEVEL OF which causes the tone arm of the E-Meter to > fluctuate. > > Place the pc in an area which has a very high tone arm reading or a very > low one and you find the pc in an area in time when he was being very > irresponsible. > It is not always true that a pc picked up as reading at the Clear reading > of his sex is high on responsibility. There is an inversion of the matter > where the pc is so very low on responsibility that he just gets a body > reading for his sex and that is that. > > The test of this is the running of Responsibility, as given in this > bulletin. > > If the pc, run on Responsibility, changes the position of the tone arm > from the Clear reading then that pc has a very long way to go perhaps > before he can achieve any responsibility. > > If a pc is run on responsibility as given herein, if his track is > explored, and if the tone arm reads and continues to read at Clear then > he is very responsible and very Clear. But you would have to run the pc a > bit not just read him on the meter in order to get an accurate view of > the matter. > > In other words, don’t look for overts to check out on a case. Look for > tone arm fluctuations when responsibility is run. It takes at least a > certain level of responsibility to show up overt acts on E-Meter. > > What exactly does the E-Meter read? > > It reads the degree of mental mass surrounding the thetan in a body. > A thetan accumulates mental mass, pictures, ridges, circuits, etc, to the > degree that he misassigns responsibility. If he does something and then > says that it was done by something or someone else then he has failed to > assign cause rightly and, doing so, he is of course left with an > apparently uncaused mental mass. > > This to us is the “bank”. To Freud it was the “unconscious”. To the > psychiatrist it is lunacy. He therefore has as much bank as he has denied > cause. As he is the only cause that could hang himself with a mass, the > only misassigned cause therefore is self cause. > > Other people’s causation is not aberrative and does not hang up except to > the degree that the pc is provoked to misassigning cause. Other people’s > cause is therefore never audited. > > Here then we have the anatomy of the reactive mind. The common > denominator of all these unwanted ridges, masses, pictures, engrams, etc, > is RESPONSIBILITY. > > The discovery of the direct anatomy of RESPONSIBILITY is as follows: > Able to admit causation. > Able to withhold from. > This you will recognize as old reach and withdraw and as the fundamental > of every successful process. But now we can refine this into the exact > process that accomplishes a removal of the reactive mind and > reestablishment of causation and responsibility. > > A thetan will not restore his own ability until he is certain he can > withhold from things. When he finds he cannot then he reduces his own > power. He will not let himself be more powerful than he believes he can > use power. When he gets mad he of course can control nothing, neither can > he really direct anything. When he causes something that he thinks is > bad, he next seeks to withhold. If he cannot withhold then he begins to > compulsively cause things that are bad and you have overt acts happening. > What we call responsibility is restored on any subject or in any case by > selecting a terminal (not a significance) and running on it: > > WHAT COULD YOU ADMIT CAUSING A (TERMINAL)? > > THINK OF SOMETHING YOU COULD WITHHOLD FROM A (TERMINAL). > > Overt acts proceed from irresponsibility. Therefore when responsibility > declines, overt acts can occur. When responsibility declines to zero then > a person doing overt acts no longer conceives them to be overt acts and > YOU DO NOT EVEN GET A WIGGLE ON THE E-METER NEEDLE when looking for > overts and withholds on such a case. > > Thus some criminals would not register on overts at all even though they > had the loot in their pockets! And it is often necessary on any case to > run Cause/Withhold on present life terminals as given above before the > person can conceive of having committed any overts against those > terminals. > THIS IS VERY IMPORTANT: No case will run well and many cases will not run > at all with present life overts and withholds undisclosed and > unflattened. > > These overts and withholds may not even come into view UNTIL THE VERSION > OF RESPONSIBILITY GIVEN HEREIN IS LIBERALLY RUN ON THE CASE. > > Choose any area where the pc conceives himself to be a victim. Select a > terminal to represent that area that falls on an E-Meter. Run > cause/withhold as given herein on that terminal and watch the overts pop > into view. It is not necessary to handle these overts when they come up > with any other process than Cause/Withhold since Cause/Withhold given > here is Responsibility. > > There are other factors on cases that need handling but these are all > handled with Responsibility processes. If all the factors involved in a > case are well handled as given herein you will have a Theta Clear who > will be able to do a lot of things humans can’t do. And if you handled a > case totally with this material and its specialized skills then you would > have an Operating Thetan. > > Fortunately for this universe no thetan will let himself go free unless > he can operate without danger to others and the responsibility factor is > way up on all dynamics. > > This material is covered in tape lectures from the Washington January > Congress 1960 (nine hours) and in the HCS Course lectures, Washington, > January 1960 (nine hours). > > The Congress, which was very warmly received in Washington, is being > replayed in many areas by public demand and the HCS Course is being given > as the HCS/BScn Course in all Central Organizations. > > This is the major breakthrough we are starting the 1960s with. We are > counting on HGCs turning out Theta Clears at regular intervals and we are > working to get all staffs of Central Organizations through to Theta Clear > on staff clearing courses. > > This material is also being used on PE Courses which now should run as > follows: One week PE Course with TR demonstrations, this free. > > People pass from this course directly into co-Audit (no Comm Course) at a > fee, on the following process: > > “What could you admit causing a person?” > > “What could you withhold from a person?” > > Terminals other than “person” may be selected by the Co-Audit > Instructor. A full intensive given by HGCs on the basis of OT-3 > Procedure is sufficiently in advance of this to make individual auditing > necessary in most cases. OT-3 has been released to all Central Orgs who > have the Washington HCS tapes. > > The CCHs are used on cases incapable of defining terms. > > In view of this material and what is now known of responsibility and > overts and what they do to case level, a new kind of justice comes into > being, making it completely unnecessary to punish. > > You can know a person by his case level. Does it advance or doesn’t it? > Does he elect others ogres when he himself has been doing things or does > he show Scientology in himself? > > This is a brand new look and it can be made a brand new earth. We started > the 1960s the right way as I think you will discover. > > > L. RON HUBBARD > Founder > Sent from my iPad > _______________________________________________ > Trom mailing list > Trom@lists.newciv.org > http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom _______________________________________________ Trom mailing list Trom@lists.newciv.org http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
