************* The following message is relayed to you by trom@lists.newciv.org ************ Just curious you wrote:
> It is up to each individual to be free of games and have their Ethics in to > avoid catching themselves up with out-Ethics and having motivators. Is not having ethics in and being free of games impossible? Ethics involves games right? Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 7, 2014, at 11:34 PM, Paul Tipon <pti...@proftitleserv.com> wrote: > > ************* > The following message is relayed to you by trom@lists.newciv.org > ************ > Hi Pete and All, > > This data from LRH is very true. From my 1st hand experience on the SHSBC I > know that this tech is was just not being applied in 86 to 90 and certainly > beyond 90. I was an excellent auditor and did many sec checks. Cos at Pac > Base even tossed top Int Execs in my lap. All were handled by me to big > wins. I had one really tough Ethics SO who had written up over a 1000 pages > of overts. I changed the O/W procedure upon my request and approval by the > C/S and actually put back in what had been taken out of the process and > cracked his case. I put back in also running responsibility. > > I know this tech very very well. > > Keep on TROMming, Paul > > ps: One factor everyone should realize is that any cause is always an overt > of some nature. But when the cause/overt is out ethics, it of course is evil > and out-ethics. Therefore realize that overts and motivators are what makes > the MEST/physical universe go-round. It is up to each individual to be free > of games and have their Ethics in to avoid catching themselves up with > out-Ethics and having motivators. One does have that freedom of choice but > one is only fully capable of making the in-Ethics choice once one is Clear > and free of Games Conditions. Free from the compulsive responses of the > mind. Remember, the greatest good for the greatest number of Dynamics and > that to withhold is an OT ability. > >> On Feb 7, 2014, at 10:31 AM, Pete Mclaughlin wrote: >> >> Hi all >> Dennis gives details about the E-Meter needle movements but doesn't say much >> about high or low Tone Arm readings. Here is the LRH view. >> >> Keep on TROMing >> Pete >> >> >> HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE >> Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex >> HCO BULLETIN OF 28 JANUARY 1960 >> HCO Secs >> >> Assn Secs >> Mission Holders >> >> THE KEY TO ALL CASES—RESPONSIBILITY >> >> During the past three months I have made several important discoveries in >> the field of the human mind which iron out the bits and pieces that were >> getting in our road in making broad clearing programmes possible. >> >> First of these was the discovery that the tone arm of the E-Meter rather >> than the needle was foremost in analyzing the case. When the tone arm reads >> at three for males and two for females on the modern meter a process can be >> considered flat. >> >> Aside from various special states such as valence shifts, this will hold >> true. When the tone arm reads at clear for the person’s sex no matter what >> one attempts to restimulate on the case you have a Clear. >> >> Additionally the hot areas of the time track are located because they throw >> the tone arm to higher or lower readings. >> >> Good auditing today cannot be done without an E-Meter of good reliable >> quality as distributed by HCO WW in the UK and by Wingate Enterprises in the >> United States. It could be said that the E-Meter has just now become an >> absolute necessity in auditing and general analysis—using the E-Meter RIGHT >> we can achieve Clears. >> >> Next, but not next in importance was the discovery of the anatomy of >> RESPONSIBILITY. Although Responsibility has been known as a case factor >> since 1951 (just as the overt-motivator sequence has been) it has not been >> until now that I have been able to get it to run well on cases. >> >> Responsibility is a significance. Pcs define it in various ways. And all >> rather tend to run from it. >> >> Pcs in general pretend they would much rather be victims than causative >> sources—which is what is wrong with their cases. >> >> In order to get responsibility to run I had to find out a lot more about it >> and not until the very end of 1959 was I able to define it in any way that >> made it run and come into being on a case. >> >> Now I mentioned the E-Meter first in this because it is RESPONSIBILITY—LEVEL >> OF which causes the tone arm of the E-Meter to fluctuate. >> >> Place the pc in an area which has a very high tone arm reading or a very low >> one and you find the pc in an area in time when he was being very >> irresponsible. >> It is not always true that a pc picked up as reading at the Clear reading of >> his sex is high on responsibility. There is an inversion of the matter where >> the pc is so very low on responsibility that he just gets a body reading for >> his sex and that is that. >> >> The test of this is the running of Responsibility, as given in this bulletin. >> >> If the pc, run on Responsibility, changes the position of the tone arm from >> the Clear reading then that pc has a very long way to go perhaps before he >> can achieve any responsibility. >> >> If a pc is run on responsibility as given herein, if his track is explored, >> and if the tone arm reads and continues to read at Clear then he is very >> responsible and very Clear. But you would have to run the pc a bit not just >> read him on the meter in order to get an accurate view of the matter. >> >> In other words, don’t look for overts to check out on a case. Look for tone >> arm fluctuations when responsibility is run. It takes at least a certain >> level of responsibility to show up overt acts on E-Meter. >> >> What exactly does the E-Meter read? >> >> It reads the degree of mental mass surrounding the thetan in a body. >> A thetan accumulates mental mass, pictures, ridges, circuits, etc, to the >> degree that he misassigns responsibility. If he does something and then says >> that it was done by something or someone else then he has failed to assign >> cause rightly and, doing so, he is of course left with an apparently >> uncaused mental mass. >> >> This to us is the “bank”. To Freud it was the “unconscious”. To the >> psychiatrist it is lunacy. He therefore has as much bank as he has denied >> cause. As he is the only cause that could hang himself with a mass, the only >> misassigned cause therefore is self cause. >> >> Other people’s causation is not aberrative and does not hang up except to >> the degree that the pc is provoked to misassigning cause. Other people’s >> cause is therefore never audited. >> >> Here then we have the anatomy of the reactive mind. The common denominator >> of all these unwanted ridges, masses, pictures, engrams, etc, is >> RESPONSIBILITY. >> >> The discovery of the direct anatomy of RESPONSIBILITY is as follows: >> Able to admit causation. >> Able to withhold from. >> This you will recognize as old reach and withdraw and as the fundamental of >> every successful process. But now we can refine this into the exact process >> that accomplishes a removal of the reactive mind and reestablishment of >> causation and responsibility. >> >> A thetan will not restore his own ability until he is certain he can >> withhold from things. When he finds he cannot then he reduces his own power. >> He will not let himself be more powerful than he believes he can use power. >> When he gets mad he of course can control nothing, neither can he really >> direct anything. When he causes something that he thinks is bad, he next >> seeks to withhold. If he cannot withhold then he begins to compulsively >> cause things that are bad and you have overt acts happening. >> What we call responsibility is restored on any subject or in any case by >> selecting a terminal (not a significance) and running on it: >> >> WHAT COULD YOU ADMIT CAUSING A (TERMINAL)? >> >> THINK OF SOMETHING YOU COULD WITHHOLD FROM A (TERMINAL). >> >> Overt acts proceed from irresponsibility. Therefore when responsibility >> declines, overt acts can occur. When responsibility declines to zero then a >> person doing overt acts no longer conceives them to be overt acts and YOU DO >> NOT EVEN GET A WIGGLE ON THE E-METER NEEDLE when looking for overts and >> withholds on such a case. >> >> Thus some criminals would not register on overts at all even though they had >> the loot in their pockets! And it is often necessary on any case to run >> Cause/Withhold on present life terminals as given above before the person >> can conceive of having committed any overts against those terminals. >> THIS IS VERY IMPORTANT: No case will run well and many cases will not run at >> all with present life overts and withholds undisclosed and unflattened. >> >> These overts and withholds may not even come into view UNTIL THE VERSION OF >> RESPONSIBILITY GIVEN HEREIN IS LIBERALLY RUN ON THE CASE. >> >> Choose any area where the pc conceives himself to be a victim. Select a >> terminal to represent that area that falls on an E-Meter. Run cause/withhold >> as given herein on that terminal and watch the overts pop into view. It is >> not necessary to handle these overts when they come up with any other >> process than Cause/Withhold since Cause/Withhold given here is >> Responsibility. >> >> There are other factors on cases that need handling but these are all >> handled with Responsibility processes. If all the factors involved in a case >> are well handled as given herein you will have a Theta Clear who will be >> able to do a lot of things humans can’t do. And if you handled a case >> totally with this material and its specialized skills then you would have an >> Operating Thetan. >> >> Fortunately for this universe no thetan will let himself go free unless he >> can operate without danger to others and the responsibility factor is way up >> on all dynamics. >> >> This material is covered in tape lectures from the Washington January >> Congress 1960 (nine hours) and in the HCS Course lectures, Washington, >> January 1960 (nine hours). >> >> The Congress, which was very warmly received in Washington, is being >> replayed in many areas by public demand and the HCS Course is being given as >> the HCS/BScn Course in all Central Organizations. >> >> This is the major breakthrough we are starting the 1960s with. We are >> counting on HGCs turning out Theta Clears at regular intervals and we are >> working to get all staffs of Central Organizations through to Theta Clear on >> staff clearing courses. >> >> This material is also being used on PE Courses which now should run as >> follows: One week PE Course with TR demonstrations, this free. >> >> People pass from this course directly into co-Audit (no Comm Course) at a >> fee, on the following process: >> >> “What could you admit causing a person?” >> >> “What could you withhold from a person?” >> >> Terminals other than “person” may be selected by the Co-Audit Instructor. A >> full intensive given by HGCs on the basis of OT-3 Procedure is sufficiently >> in advance of this to make individual auditing necessary in most cases. OT-3 >> has been released to all Central Orgs who have the Washington HCS tapes. >> >> The CCHs are used on cases incapable of defining terms. >> >> In view of this material and what is now known of responsibility and overts >> and what they do to case level, a new kind of justice comes into being, >> making it completely unnecessary to punish. >> >> You can know a person by his case level. Does it advance or doesn’t it? Does >> he elect others ogres when he himself has been doing things or does he show >> Scientology in himself? >> >> This is a brand new look and it can be made a brand new earth. We started >> the 1960s the right way as I think you will discover. >> >> >> L. RON HUBBARD >> Founder > > _______________________________________________ > Trom mailing list > Trom@lists.newciv.org > http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom _______________________________________________ Trom mailing list Trom@lists.newciv.org http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
