************* The following message is relayed to you by trom@lists.newciv.org ************ Hi Leo Thank you for the offer.
The section of the logical note I gave as an example is technically correct as published in the original TROM book because Dennis and Greg define X as to know and Y as to be known. The problem is that through out the book the postulate failure cycles for the junior goals packages are named after the leg 1 postulate: To create, to love, to have etc. but the "to be known" postulate failure cycles is named after the leg 3 postulate, to know. For me as a student trying to learn TROM the lack of a definition of "to be known" and this repeated referral to a "to know" postulate failure cycle created a confusion. I asked myself, Where did "to be known" go? Is "to know" and "to be known" the same thing? Once I defined "to be known" and read back through the TROM book these misuses of "to know" in place of "to be known" stuck out like a sore thumb. In the logical note section X should be defined as the leg one postulate so that any leg one postulate can be plugged into X. This is necessary to make the frequent use of Boolean algebra consistent. X must always be: To be known, To Create. To Love. To Admire. To Enhance. To Help. To Feel. To Control. To Own. To Have. To Eat, or To Sex. Y must always be To know, To be Created. To be Loved. To be Admired. To be Enhanced. To be Helped. To be Felt. To be Controlled. To be Owned. To be Had. To be Eaten, or To be Sexed. I have made these changes in the manual that I am proof reading now and it is much more understandable than the previous version. Does this make sense to you? Sincerely Pete Sent from my iPad > On Aug 4, 2014, at 3:05 AM, Leo Faulhaber <leo.faulha...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Dear Pete > > I just saw your post. > > Per my knowledge everything is ok the way it is stated and I believe that it > must be an MU on your side. > > If you want me to help you to find and clarify it I can do so. > > For a beginning please let me know your definitions of: > > - x > - y > - (1-x) > - (1-y) > > Best regards > > Leo Faulhaber > > _______________________________________________ Trom mailing list Trom@lists.newciv.org http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
