Well..Seems to me that different people will want to use different keys, so may be you could store the keybindings in an external file that the user can modify, as yasr does. :) --Michael Gorse, WPI Cs '01 / ICQ:22583968 / http://www.wpi.edu/~mgorse/ -- If you're an oister, then don't let your perl get away from you. On Mon, 31 Jul 2000, A. R. Vener wrote: > > I suggest you take a page from the emacs, lynx and vi book and > use only keys which can be touch typd. I have no problem with > For example > f, b can be forward and backword six second > ^f, ^b can be forwad and backward one minute > >, < - forward and backward ten minutes etc. > > and so forth. These keys have the advantage of being touch typable. I for > one hat to use any keypad key because it means taking ten seconds to locate > my position on the keypad instead of just typing from the main keyboard. > > > This constraint would make it most friendly to blind users IMHO. > > Rudy > > > From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 30 20:02:27 2000 > > Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Received: from braille.uwo.ca ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [129.100.109.30]) > > by cougar.aero-vision.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA09631 > > for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 30 Jul 2000 20:02:27 -0400 > > Received: from speech.braille.uwo.ca(localhost[127.0.0.1]) (1875 bytes) by >braille.uwo.ca > > via smail with P:esmtp/R:inet_hosts/T:smtp > > (sender: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) > > id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 30 Jul 2000 20:02:21 -0400 (EDT) > > (Smail-3.2.0.102 1998-Aug-2 #2 built 1999-Sep-5) > > Received: from braille.uwo.ca(localhost[127.0.0.1]) (1137 bytes) by braille.uwo.ca > > via smail with P:esmtp/D:aliases/T:pipe > > (sender: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) > > id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 30 Jul 2000 20:02:19 -0400 (EDT) > > (Smail-3.2.0.102 1998-Aug-2 #2 built 1999-Sep-5) > > Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Redefining command keys > > Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2000 20:02:19 -0400 > > From: Matthew Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > X-Mailman-Version: 1.1 > > Precedence: bulk > > List-Id: mailing list for announcements and discussion regarding trplayer ><trplayer.braille.uwo.ca> > > X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Shortly after the release of trplayer 1.1.0, Dave Mielke sent me some > > ideas for the command keys in trplayer. He thinks that the left and > > right arrows should move by 6 seconds, the up and down arrows should > > move by 60 seconds (1 minute), and the page-up and page-down keys > > should move by 10 minutes. He also suggested that the home key should > > make it go back to the beginning, and the end key should make it go to > > the end with an automatic pause. I think these are good ideas; the > > only potential problem I see is that in the standard RealPlayer, > > page-up and page-down move between clips (something I just figured out > > how to do last night). So I'm thinking that for these functions, I > > should use the plus and minus keys, as FreeAmp does. What do you > > think? > > > > -- > > Matt Campbell > > Web site: http://www.crosswinds.net/~mattcamp/ > > ICQ #: 33005941 > > > >
Re: Redefining command keys
Mike Gorse Mon, 31 Jul 2000 11:40:00 -0400 (EDT) (Smail-3.2.0.102 1998-Aug-2 #2 built 1999-Sep-5)
- Redefining command keys Matthew Campbell
- Re: Redefining command keys Dave Mielke
- Re: Redefining command keys Chris Nestrud
- Re: Redefining command keys Matthew Campbell
- Re: Redefining command keys Matthew Campbell
- Re: Redefining command keys A. R. Vener
- Re: Redefining command keys Mike Gorse
- Re: Redefining command keys Matthew Campbell
- Re: Redefining command keys Matthew Campbell
- Re: Redefining command keys Chris Nestrud
- Re: Redefining command keys Dave Mielke
- Re: Redefining command keys A. R. Vener
- Re: Redefining command keys Matthew Campbell
- Re: Redefining command keys Dave Mielke
- Re: Redefining command keys Matthew Campbell
- Re: Redefining command keys Mike Gorse
- Re: Redefining command keys Dave Mielke
