What frustrates me is Mormons will quickly agree with something, but you cannot believe them. Upon further examination they don't believe what they claimed they believed at all.
When I ask them a question over and over and I get different answers to the same question. This is why their Jesus is suspect as being the Biblical Jesus. They claimed they believed Walter Martin's statement of what Jesus Christians believe in. I didn't believe them for a second. "God the Son, second person of the Trinity." I asked again. Now we experience what we have experienced before; a REDEFINED meaning of a word. Yes, I believe it, but with qualifications. Mormonism is like a spider web.
Mormons are quick to agree, but you have to delve and delve to find out what they really believe.
Are they deliberately lying? I think not. They are caught in the Mormon spider web.
Now to answer you questions. I believe in both infallibility and inerrancy in the original manuscripts.
To explain, in political terms. I thought Barry Goldwater was too liberal. :-)
DaveH, from the definitions outlined above, would you say that you believe
in "infallibility" but not "inerrancy"? Or, would you say that you do not
believe in either?
Glenn, would you say that you believe in both infallibility and inerrancy?
