By the way, I did see this woman
on TV tonight, and she is not really comatose, as I assumed. She seems
to be at about the level of an infant, mentally. So I am undecided about
whether it is right to refuse artificial medical treatment in this case, when
is unable to feed herself. I certainly have more of a problem with it.
What do you all think? And (ignoring unproven allegations of her
husband’s abuse), do you think the Lord requires someone in such a situation
to remain married to a person in a vegetative state for years?
Izzy
-----Original
Message-----
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of
ShieldsFamily
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 10:42
PM
To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Wickedness
waxing more and more
OK. This brings
up an interesting subject: Is there a right to die? Personally, I don’t
want anybody forcing my body to live in a vegetative state by artificial means
if I’m already departed. I think it is the cruelest thing to do.
It is obviously wrong to KILL someone artificially via drug injection.
It is just as bad to artificially FORCE someone’s body to stay alive via
feeding tube. Give the person a decent interval to recover, but 13
years???
When your body
stops eating, it is saying “Time for me to go.” It is sickening to see
all the 90+ year old gomers in the nursing homes living day after day
connected to a feeding tube; like so many wrinkled up old fetuses attached to
umbilical cords. The person does not suffer if you allow nature to take its
course and die. I don’t blame her husband for not wanting to be married
to a corpse longer than 13 years. Our society has the perverted idea
that we must keep the dead alive and murder the unborn. She’s already
GONE; so get over it.
Izzy
-----Original
Message-----
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Chris
Barr
Sent: Wednesday,
September 17, 2003 7:56 PM
To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [TruthTalk] Wickedness waxing
more and more
Greetings in the Matchless
Name of YahShua !!
OK, this woman collapsed
mysteriously in 1990.
Her husband sued doctors and won $1.3 million for
her care.
Husband never spent a nickel on any rehabilitative therapy --
only sustenance care.
5 years ago he began trying to have her feeding
tube removed and won't allow her to be hand fed. She breathes on her
own.
Oh, by the way, that is when hubby started shacking up with
another whom he subsequently had a child by.
Then it is discovered that
a bone scan done in 1991 revealed numerous trauma spots as though she had been
severly beaten in the past.
Oh, by the way, the lawyer the husband has
hired is a "right to die" expert ... and he has been paid with part of the
$1.3 million originally awarded for the woman's care.
Oh, and if the
woman is allowed to starve to death (as the court has been ordering but the
parents have been fighting) then hubby gets the rest of the money for
himself.
www.baynews9.com/site/New...ryid=24706
www.terrisfight.org/lead.htm
