RE: [TruthTalk] the real vs false

[ShieldsFamily]

Lance, Did I miss the original question? Izzy   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir Sent: Friday, June 11, 2004 3:45 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] the real vs false   Izzy: Yes/No (book)? Lance ----- Original Message ----- From: ShieldsFamily To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: June 10, 2004 19:08 Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] the real vs false   The dogs were never a match for the Cat. J   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jonathan Hughes Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 3:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] the real vs false   Good day Izzy,   I shall call off the dogs.  I may even climb down from my high horse demanding apologies from anyone that moves.  My attempts at convicting others of sin have always been failures; perhaps the Holy Spirit really is better at it.  Sigh, unemployed again!   After saying lets agree to disagree you make one final poke; enjoy it.  If I was a big man I would not poke back.   Must…..   Stop…..   Typing…..     To reconciliation from our Lord Jesus Christ,   Jonathan From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ShieldsFamily Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 9:20 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] the real vs false   Jonathan, I think there is little point in belaboring this discussion any further.  I am “extreme” about everything I believe in, and see that as a result of my “extreme” commitment to God.  I am not lukewarm about anything.  Let’s just agree to disagree. You’ll have to malign America and President Bush to someone else who will agree with you, like G.  Izzy   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jonathan Hughes I feel that your extreme pro-American stance (with takes the religiosity of Christianity and mixes it with patriotism) is an unchristian stance, one that works against your faith.    Jonathan