ï
 
 
jt: Why do you ask for my words Lance when God's Word is so much better?
 
On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 12:54:05 -0400 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jt:God is a Covenant God?? Again, in your own words..what is a 'covenant God?'
On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 10:40:34 EDT [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The woman I sleep with most nights is both a wife and a mother.  Two very different things.  Same woman. 
 
jt: Not a good object lesson and more of an avoidance technique.  God is a "Covenant" God all the way through scripture and the New Covenant is called just that.  Why try to make it something else that is "new or different?" This denominational indoctrination is so difficult to get past.
 
js:It is in fact a great object lesson avoiding absolutely nothing.   It was an effort to illustrate the fact that the law and the covenant are joined at the hip in some regard.  Why try to make it something else that is "new or different?"   you ask.   Because in a number of places in scripture this comparison is made ---  not to mention the prophetical description of the "new" in comparison to the existing covenant  (Jere 31:31-34) 
 
Tim: The short answer:  There were nine covenants.  Which one were you specifically asking for?

js: Everybody has a niche.

Tim: When you use the term Old Covenant it typically refers to the covenant the LORD made with the house of Israel after he brought them out of the land of Egypt.  It established the Levitical Priesthood and system of animal sacrifices.  The New covenant (Abraham, Moses, Isaac, Jacob, David, etcâ) established that the Law would be written in their hearts and on their minds.

js: This covenant of inwardness -- something you do not accept -- has always been there.  God has always been a God who honored outpouring and contrition over obedience. But it is His revelation that cast issue in view of two covenants.   At the Cross, things changed dramatically.   The "law" was used to drive home the fact that man will never be justified in the keeping of law.  This paragraph may come back to haunt you.   Time will tell.  Right now, I agree with your thought, above, in a general sense.
 
jt: How will it come back to haunt him?  We've discussed Jeremiah 31:33 a lot here, I thought we understood and agreed that this is the New Covenant promise John.
 
js: Yes we have.  See below for potential problem  (i.e. the haunting.) 
 
Tim: I think we should be very careful about not interchanging the word Law with the word covenant.  They are not the same.  The Law addresses all the covenants; which incidentally are part of the LAW.

js: Your are getting close to this "interchange"  in the preceding paragraph.   Tim  --  are you trying to win the discussion or have a discussion.   If it is about winning,  hey, I think I can do that but to what avail.?   Try to imagine that someone (me) who has been around for a while, would see a difference between "law" and "covenant."  
 
jt: I don't think he is trying to win anything John - His testimony as I understand it does not include denominational training. He reads the Bible.  What he is saying here is what the Bible teaches.

js: All this is to say that he agrees with you.  
 
jt: Tim is saying what I see in scripture even though I didn't come the same way as he. When the Spirit of God reached out to me I ran to Church circles thinking they would help me along; after much maze like confusion I came to the same place and have learned more from reading the Bible myself.  So far as I can tell he is saying the same as what I have been trying to say but he says it a little differently.

Tim: You asked if I observed the Sabbath.  I sincerely appreciate the way you phrased that question.  The commandment states that we are to âremember the Sabbathâ.  To say I keep Sabbath is indicating that Sabbathâs keeping is within my power.  The Mother of Harlots re-wrote that command saying âKeep the Sabbath Holyâ.

js: LOL.   I love rudeness.   I just have to shake my head and laugh. 
jt: Why do you assume his intent is to be rude John rather than that he is just stating his belief?

js: Let's see  -- I asked about keeping the Sabboth and suddenly I am in the camp parented by The Mother Harlots.   Complimenatary or insulting?   I report, you decide. 
 
jt: I never take things like this quite so personally John. My question is "truth or error?"  I may not have worded it as bluntly but what Tim says is true. Check it out in Exodus 13:3.  The sabbath is a sign between God and Israel. This is especially meaningful to me because I have a dear friend who is all taken up with this sabbath thing having been recruited by the 7th Day Adventists. Everything about her outwardly has changed and I don't believe it is for the good.
 
To answer your question, I observe the Sabbath, remembering that God made it Holy.

js: Thanks for trying to figure out what I was asking.  

Do you keep the Law?

js: As defined in terms of faith (conviction), love and the Spirit  -- absolutely.
 
jt: Interesting - does this mean you are conformed to the "image of Christ" already John?  judyt
 
js: I am on that very pathway. 
 
jt: Then why would you object to God's Law since it is the schoolmaster or teacher that leads us along the "pathway?"  Another error in the denominational Church is the idea that when we say our prayer to receive Christ, we have arrived; young believers for the most part have no idea that this is only the beginning and we are to strive for the mastery in all things so that we might 'gain Christ' - they've been told they've got Him already.






 
 
 

Reply via email to