David, I broke your statement down into parts and answered accordingly: More properly, it might be said that there was a time when the Logos
1) was not the Son of David, -- Yes. 2) was not the Son of Man, -- Yes. 3) was not the Son of God, -- No. The Logos was always the Son of the Father. 4) was not the Christ, was not Messiah, -- Yes. 5) was not Yeshua, was not Jesus, -- Yes. Although I will be very interested to see Judy's response here. Moreover, I am surprised at your own reversal as it relates to this admission. 6) and was not Emmanuel, ... -- Yes. 7) He became all these things through the miracle of the incarnation. -- No, but we are five out of six in terms of agreement. Is that how you see it Judy? ---------- "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
