this is crucial--all
posts carry interpretive baggage; obviously, jts 'science of
intepretation', theologically, is not yours; also, she maintains that it's only her
'science of intepretation' that perfectly equates to 'rightly dividing the Word
of Truth'
in the background, like
'stealth' is to a B1 bomber, the hermeneutic in play is that
unlearnedness rules; in 'bible, bible, bible' posts laced
with the authors' 'unlearnable' Truth, knowing without
learning appears to be the operative hermeneutical
dynamic
to account simultaneously for
(e.g., jt's) aggressive anti-intellectual comments--parallel bias against those
who know by or through learning together--requires some
intelligence
how could one cut
through this w/o the foregoing assessment in play?
this is a high magnitude
moderator conundrum--very complex; thanks for sticking with it, enquiring,
etc.--its v helpful(!); hopefully the foregoing helps our readers to follow the
discussion, too
G
On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 15:11:39 -0700 "Bill
Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
- Re: [TruthTalk] Original Sin ttxpress
- Re: [TruthTalk] Original Sin Bill Taylor
- Re: [TruthTalk] Original Sin Judy Taylor
- Re: [TruthTalk] Original Sin Lance Muir
- Re: [TruthTalk] Original Sin ttxpress
- Re: [TruthTalk] Original Sin Terry Clifton
- Re: [TruthTalk] Original Sin Knpraise
- Re: [TruthTalk] Original Sin Lance Muir
- Re: [TruthTalk] Original Sin Terry Clifton
- RE: [TruthTalk] Original Sin ShieldsFamily
- RE: [TruthTalk] weekly perverty report from Sal... Kevin Deegan