DAVEH: Whew! That is a lot of stuff, Perry. After reading through
it though, I find much I'd dispute, starting with....... G-3: Jesus is clearly not the Son of God in a literal sense, i.e., He was not physically procreated by God ........As you might suspect Perry, I do believe Jesus is clearly and literally, the Son of God. I also find it curious that the author does not discuss the plural meaning of Elohim, nor does he address some key passages such as Mt 5:48 nor does he discuss to my satisfaction the oneness of God as it applies to man as found in Jn 17:21. Likewise, he doesn't address the nature of the Godhead very well. In short, there is a lot I find lacking in this rather lengthy summary. Charles Perry Locke wrote: The mormon jesus is NOT the Jesus of the Bible, the one we Christians worship. Check out this link for details: -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.langlitz.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If you wish to receive things I find interesting, I maintain six email lists... JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS, STUFF, MOTORCYCLE and CLIPS. |
- Re: [TruthTalk] Hows does this Mormon concept work Dave Hansen
- Re: [TruthTalk] Hows does this Mormon concept wor... Lance Muir
- Re: [TruthTalk] Hows does this Mormon concept... Dave Hansen
- Re: [TruthTalk] Hows does this Mormon concept wor... Charles Perry Locke
- Re: [TruthTalk] Hows does this Mormon concept... Dave Hansen
- Re: [TruthTalk] Hows does this Mormon con... Charles Perry Locke
- Re: [TruthTalk] Hows does this Mormon concept wor... Charles Perry Locke
- Re: [TruthTalk] Hows does this Mormon concept wor... Kevin Deegan
- Re: [TruthTalk] Hows does this Mormon concept... Dave Hansen
- Re: [TruthTalk] Hows does this Mormon con... Kevin Deegan
- Re: [TruthTalk] Hows does this Mormon... Dave Hansen