John wrote: > That is true -- hopefully you will come to > see your complicity in the problem, as well.
I have always maintained that I have violated the no ad hominem rule also and that I have to work hard at not doing it. One reason I like to have someone other than myself moderate the list is so they can help keep me in line. :-) David Miller wrote: >> Lance mentioned about the importance of framing questions >> rather than answers, and that was what I was doing when >> I asked you to define your terms. John wrote: > That is not what you were doing, at all. You were busy > trying to convince who knows who that I was functioning > from a perspective of doubt and unbelief. I think I know my motivations better than you do. I still believe that you don't see us included in the Johanian passage we were discussing because of doubt and unbelief concerning the kingdom authority conveyed in that passage. John wrote: > If you hadn't misrepresented what I wrote, you would > have made some progress. I quoted you exactly as you wrote it and conveyed the garbled message that came across to me from that. I also acknowledged that this could not possibly be what you meant, and so I suggested that you must have a different understanding of the words we were using. I asked you to define your terms and attempt to communicate what appeared to be contradictions in your post. John wrote: > But that is how you do business with me. You take these matters way too personal. Peace be with you. David Miller. ---------- "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
