Noone who thinks they know anything about anything is
ever fine with Lance; he is the one who says we can't
know because of Enlightenment thinking and all that
because it has stymied the Holy Spirit who just can't
perform
anymore because of
it which makes the Bible useless and impossible to understand....
comprehende????
Or, you could conclude that the Spirit is not yet finished leading.
That way, you would not be claiming that
the Bible is in error. Terry
On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 13:57:20 -0400 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
- Re: [TruthTalk] A 'prooftexter' vs a 'contexter' Judy Taylor
- Re: [TruthTalk] A 'prooftexter' vs a 'contexter' Lance Muir
- Re: [TruthTalk] A 'prooftexter' vs a 'context... Terry Clifton
- Re: [TruthTalk] A 'prooftexter' vs a 'con... Charles Perry Locke
- [TruthTalk] Christian Divisiveness Dave
- Re: [TruthTalk] A 'prooftexter' vs a 'contexter' Judy Taylor
- Re: [TruthTalk] A 'prooftexter' vs a 'context... Lance Muir
- RE: [TruthTalk] A 'prooftexter' vs a 'con... ShieldsFamily
- Re: [TruthTalk] A 'prooftexter' vs a ... Lance Muir