too bad
DaveH
has no similar feel for these critiques
On Sat, 12 Nov 2005 18:16:53 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Something is seriously wrong, here, Deegan. I almost feel like I am in a revival and you is the preacher and I am saying "Amen." This is freaking me out !!!JD
-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin Deegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Sat, 12 Nov 2005 14:47:56 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Christ and the Law
Too bad DH is gonna earn it himself & Jesus!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Yes and amen !! Imputed righteousness YES !! Deserved (read: earned) righteousness NO !!JD
-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin Deegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Sat, 12 Nov 2005 07:32:02 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Christ and the Law
Even as David also describeth the blessedness of the man, unto whom God imputeth righteousness without works, Saying, Blessed are they whose iniquities are forgiven, and whose sins are covered. Blessed is the man to whom the Lord will not impute sin.
Thanks to Jesus, In my Fathers eyes, there is NO PROBLEM! PTL!
Charles Perry Locke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
>To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
>Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Christ and the Law
>Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2005 08:23:22 -0500
>
>Perry, the issue of "sinless" perfection or sinless maturity is not
>resolved with Strong's definition of the Greek word. In exegetical
>studies, there is much more to the discovery of "definition" (in a given
>passage) than the mere defining of a word. In this case, I believe that
>semantical considerations are given qualification as they stand in the
>light of syntax. In your personal studies, you might consider the effect
>of "............. as your Heavenly Father is ........... " and the
>grammatical influence it might have on the gk word translated "perfect" or
>"mature." Further, certain theological considerations are sure to rise
>from both c onsiderations (semantical and that of syntax) ---------
>what are those theological considerations? For example: is there any
>comparison with God that would allows us to think something other than
>"sinless" or "without flaw?" If so , what and why? If not, ditto
>(?)
>
>
>JD
Uncle. I give. I appreciate you donning you pedagogical hat so early in the
crisp California morning, but I do not put on my protoge hat this early.
Perry
----------
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org
If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.