Re: [TruthTalk] corrector/revisor

Thu, 17 Nov 2005 22:39:04 -0800

You are pretty good with your excuses.    
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin Deegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 21:29:11 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] corrector/revisor

A couple of posts you said you were done with the subject now you goad me on
 
How long have you had this problem?
Which one is the REAL JD?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well,  as soon as he comes out of hiding, perhaps.   But think about this  --   brother Deegan managed to come up with a complaint about the 22 weeks which has proven to be   ....    aaaaahhhhh  ---   very weak.   His other remarks  (read: quotes ) only validate my explanation.   I am taking odds that he will not be answering these questions.   I have lost track of the unanswered questions I have asked this good brother over the past year or so.  
 
JD
 
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 19:57:12 -0700
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] corrector/revisor

this kind of interaction is interesting
 
On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 21:54:22 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
Soooo,   the KJV is based upon a corrupted Latin Vulgate that was repaired by the Dutch Catholic, Erasmus  ??  !!!  How did he know that the Vulgate was corrupted?   He only had 4 to no more than 6 greek MSS .   How did he accomplish this? & ;nbs p; What were his sources?   How do we know that he made the right decision in every case?   His text contains something like 1838 variant readings  when compared to the Vulgate.   S o we just take your word that Erasmus's variant readings are the correct readings ??!!  And in which edition did he do this, Kevin   --   first, second,  or fifth????   Which one is right and how do you KNOW.   I have answered your questions.   Now,  it is your turn.  
< /DIV>

Reply via email to