Debbie wrote:
She is neither
learning nor teaching here but is doubtless fruitful elsewhere.
You do
not speak for all, Debbie. And I take offense at your comments here. I learn
very much from Judy's posts. I cannot speak for Judy, but I believe she is
learning much from her pressence here--I know I do--as TT is a great forum to
hear new ideas.
Debbie wrote:
She
should not be participating in such a forum at all.
I suspect that such
a sentiment is not Judy's problem, but your own. The aim of communication and
debate does not have to be agreement. TT is a place to air out ideas. Just
because one member of TT isn't as responsive as you would like her to be does
not make her ideas unvalid. Your statement was condescending and
closed-minded.
-Christine
Lance Muir
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-----
Original Message -----
Sent: January 08, 2006 08:41
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Christ - incarnate God
(Judy)
You see? She sometimes does believe in the
deity of Christ. She goes down a trail of disagreeing with somebody because
of who it is or some shibboleth they have used, instead of thinking properly
about what they are saying, and then finds, surprise surprise, she
is contradicting her own belief. That is what makes it so maddening to try
to "dialogue" (misnomer if ever there was one) with her: not so much
her insultingness, but her constant sabotage of communication. It is a
complete waste of time--and the thing is, it's not just one's own time, but
hers also that is wasted, since I'm sure (as you've often said too) that
when she's not writing on TT she's doing many truly worthwhile and admirable
things. She should not be participating in such a forum at all. I think it
would be more charitable just to leave her unanswered till she gets bored
and signs off and goes about her proper God-ordained business. She is
neither learning nor teaching here but is doubtless fruitful
elsewhere.
D
I don't deny Christ is God any more than I deny the
Holy Spirit is God or the Father is God
JD
