Bill wrote: > Judy has been quite elusive and, when not, > contradictory. I've asked her a very specific > question. We'll see if she addresses it or takes > the winding road yet again.
May I suggest that if she does not answer the question, that you consider leading her into your own reflections about how to answer the question. I think you and some others here treat Judy like a professor on the wrong side of the tracks who needs to be caught in her words so that you have some way of showing her to be in error. Judy is wise enough to smell a setup, and she has perhaps not considered your question from the historical and scholarly approach that you and I have. There is nothing wrong with someone not answering a question. You may be tempted to say that she should admit that she does not know the answer to your question, but given that she has been promised by the Scriptures to be led into all truth by the Spirit of God, that would not be an appropriate response for her. The truth is either already within her, or it is coming to her as we speak. Perhaps even the Lord might use you to bring the articulation of the proper answer. So, rather than being upset that she has not answered her question, lead her into your own considerations of the proper answer. You can do it slowly, a piece at a time if you like. You and I both know that the answer to this question goes towards a balanced understanding of Christ's humanity and Divinity, and the answer hits directly upon a proper understanding of the Incarnation. Peace be with you. David Miller. ---------- "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
