myth (you are begging the question in your analysis below, assuming that the fathers hold no authority whatsoever, which is the assertion being made in the first place.)
 
David Miller.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 11:51 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Christ - incarnate God (Judy)

myth (a typically empty esoteric equation--actually, an 'adherent' of the church fathers is a ridiculous idea--a student of their residual impact could conclude, like Calvin did, that they remain invisibly intellectually influential, but (for him, too, as for Bill) their authority per se is long gone; but, by contrast, LDS adherence is today, to an ongoing existential authority present to millions of Mormons and enforced--an arrogance already arresting all ready aimlessly academic Americans)
 
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 06:44:14 -0500 "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
<<Attaching you to the fathers ..is no different than calling the LDS adherents in this forum "Mormons."  >>

Reply via email to