I can't help myself Judy! When I re-read our correspondence, I invariably think of George Burns & Gracie Allen so, 'say goodnight Gracie'.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: January 19, 2006 15:05
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Something to think about

So Lance IYO every time I cite Scripture it is in error?
One of us is wrong and sadly we will have to wait until we are deceased to find out which one it is.
I see yor doctrine as no different than the doctrine of Balaam which is in effect that ppl will make it with or without sin.
There is no overcoming involved because of the "incarnation" - at least this is what I have been hearing from you.
 
 
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 14:46:52 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
You add your meaning to God's Word, Judy, 'almost' (I included this so as not to be identified by David as a blasphemer)
every time you cite Scripture. How is that everyone on TT knows this while you do not?

 
Excellent point JD
And we should do the exact same thing with God's Words - that is, let Him be God and refrain from adding
our meaning to His Word, or subtracting His meaning from His Word as has been done in the past and is
ongoing today.  His Word says that He hates mixture.  His Word says that Jesus was/is pure and holy from
His birth.  I rest my case..
 
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 17:53:54 +0000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
OK  -- so why not say it that way?   When you say "Then he's a Mormon Jesus  -  who has a problem with that?"  you are not speaking of a single aspect of the Mormon Jesus.   You are equating Lance's teaching with Mormonism AND THE ASSOCIATED BIAS THAT EXISTS ON THIS FORUM.   You are simply trying to win the argument with the use of such language.   Words mean something.  We should mean what we say and actually say what we mean.  jd
 
 
From: Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I'm speaking of one aspect ONLY JD and that is the "exactly like us" part.
This tells me that those who make and profess such doctrines have no understanding or
spiritual discernment and do not walk in the fear of God..
 
 
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 16:45:56 +0000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The God of the earth, the Mormon God of this earth, is some guy who made it on another planet and was given this planet as a reward!   Where, in all that, Judy,   do you see even a similarity between that view and the one that declares Christ to be both YHWH and Messian !!!!???   If you truly believe this,  you neither understand the Mormon God nor the Christian God.    
 
And,  as I have said before  -- your God is neither of the two.   You stand alone with your thinking on this.   Need I bring up BSF or your pastor again?  
 
Actually,  Strong and Dakes probable [both] disagree with you. 
 
You stand alone. 
 
jd
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
-------------- Original message --------------
From: Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Then he's a Mormon Jesus ... who has a problem with that??
 
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 09:19:52 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jesus is neither unambiguously human with our humanity nor unambiguously God with God's divinity. This would make Jesus some 'third thing'. (Arianism)
 
Sometimes you will hear people say 'Jesus is human all right but, he's more than human. That which is more than human isn't human. That which is less than God isn't God. So, said the Arians, Jesus is more than human but less than God.
 
JESUS IS WHOLLY GOD AND WHOLLY HUMAN SIMULTANEOUSLY.
 
 
 
 

Reply via email to