corrections
----- Original Message -----
From: Taylor
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 5:31 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Was Jesus of God's Nature?

John writes  >  No one in this discussion believes that Christ sinned, Dean. 

 

cd responds   >  Respectfully- If one states that Christ had a fallen nature sinful nature that is what one is saying John.

 

No, Dean, it is not. Rather, it is what you hear us saying. Your hearing, however, is influenced by your view of sin. That John and I and Debbie and Lance, and even David on this one, are coming from a different vantage point than you, is a given. Why assume then that you can see well enough from your perch to identify things from ours? I began my previous post with an assurance that none of us view Jesus as a sinner; John did the same with his; yet you continue to speak only from a limited view, rather than budge just a little, that you might see him more completely. There must be some reason why we can see Jesus as fully representative of humankind in sinful flesh, and yet uphold the truth that he did not sin while in that flesh. Why must you conclude therefore that he must have been a sinner? Why not give us the benefit of the doubt, if for just a peek, and try to see things from our perspective?

 

You have a Christ who was born perfected from the womb, yet the writer to the Hebrews clearly states that Christ "learned obedience through suffering" and that it was only after "having been perfected" -- that is, after his resurrection even -- that he became the Author of salvation.

 

You have a Christ who was born fully sanctified, yet Jesus himself says, "I sanctify myself (present continuous) that they too might be sanctified by the truth."

 

You have a Christ who did not experience the temptations of a fallen man, yet Paul writes that he came in the likeness of our sinful flesh, because of sin, that he might condemn sin in the flesh.

 

You have a Christ who did not share in our humanity, yet Luke assures us that he was born of the fruit of David's genitals according to the flesh, and the writer to the Hebrews that as much as we "share in flesh and blood, He Himself likewise also partook of the same," ... that he might assume the nature of Abraham's offspring.

 

Indeed their is enough here to warrant a second look, Dean. But if you will not budge, then I must respectfully request that you please keep silent about things you cannot see.

 

Bill


--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by Plains.Net, and is
believed to be clean.

Reply via email to