JD wrote: > The shock and awe you all experienced with > the use of the f'in word is the same dismay > many feel when the word sodomite is used.
The context, however, is much different. Homosexuals should be ashamed of the word sodomite. They should also be ashamed of the word Queer. However, they are working hard for society to accept the word Queer as a nice term, and they will do the same thing with the word sodomite. Right now, however, society thinks of what sodomy means, and many people still consider this sexual perversion. A very frequent question I am asked is whether or not sodomy is acceptable between a man and a woman. When I respond that it is not, they jest about being greatly disappointed. Do we know that people don't like the word "sodomy"? Of course. However, we use it because 1) it is not a foul word like the F word, and 2) it brings to light the perversion of what homosexuality is all about. I would rather use the word sodomy or sodommite to make my point rather than trying to detail exactly what is wrong with what they do. Some of us try hard to use illustrations, such as an electrical cord with male and female ends, showing who male to male does not work as it was designed. Sometimes, however, people don't get it and we do have to more specifically describe what we are talking about, much to the embarrassment of people who truly do not understand the kind of life that homosexuals are promoting with their agenda. Judy wrote: > She brought out that passionate discontent > rather brilliantly. Perhaps so, but she grossly fails to understand the spiritual reasons for this discontent. David Miller. ---------- "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
