Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Interesting observation

[Lance Muir]

I'd be interested to know if DM's "coming together one's" exude an ethos that's welcoming to the very ones he and Christine have centered out for censure.?? Please don't presume to read my mind on this one. ----- Original Message ----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org ; TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: February 03, 2006 07:35 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Interesting observation But don't you see that if we regard gluttony and homosexuality the same,  we cannot order anyone out of our churches?   Where would we be if sinners were actually allowed and even encouraged to attend?     We have been to told to preach to the world.   Leave them, then, in the world  -  not in the church.   Pastor Smithson Bishop of Love Minister of Understanding And Judge of the Bastards   -------------- Original message -------------- From: "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Morality/Immorality are = in the eyes of God! Importuning the "immoral" AND focusing on particular sins indicates a thoroughgoing misunderstanding of the nature of the Triune God and His Triune Gospel!  DM along with at least one of his offspring seem to be so actively engaged. NOW is the occasion for sadness. ----- Original Message ----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org ; TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: February 02, 2006 19:48 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Interesting observation Thanks for this post.  You do understand my concern?   Socially speaking.,  the gay fellows can be most disgusting  -- beyond what I care to describe.  And,  most in their community defend their  outragious public behavior -- which was rather surprising to me when I realized this.     There is no doubt in my mind that Christ encountered a number of these individuals in His personal ministry  -  certanly the evangleists and Apostles did in their sojourn.    It is treated with the same regard as most other sins , in the scriptures.      For example  --  it is on the same list as "back talking one's parents."  The first item on that list is homosexuality, of course.  The point I see from this consideration is not that homosexuality is no worse than disobedience to your parents  -  rather that disobedience to your parents is just as bad as homosexuality !!   Sin is sin and it is terrible.     jd   -------------- Original message -------------- From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> JD wrote: > Sodomite is a name we call people just > as "nigger" is a word that offends.       I don't see it that way, John.  Sodomite is a Biblical word, and it points to a particular sexual practice.  Furthermore, it reminds the hearer of the Biblical city which brought upon them God's judgment for accepting and engaging this kind of sexual behavior.  The homosexual agenda has hijacked the English language by adopting the word "Gay" for themselves.  If they can incorrectly use the word gay, then I can correctly use the word sodomite to remind people exactly what we are talking about.   Nevertheless, I ought to make it clear to you that I rarely use the word "sodomite."  In fact, I suspect that it is possible that I may have never used the word sodomite, but I could be wrong about that.  I usually talk about the evil of sodomy, and I often talk about the University's Official Department of Sodomy or State Sanctioned Sodomy or Government Funding for the Promotion of Sodomy and Fornication.   Your choice of a racial slur for comparison causes me concern that you have perhaps been deceived into thinking that homosexuality is a racial issue, and that homosexuals are born the way the are.  Do you think homosexuals need special protection from prejudice just as other minority ethnic groups would?  Are you in agreement with the legalization of homosexuality and adultery?   David Miller.