The CNN report:  Asked if creationism should be taught in schools, Williams 
said: "I don't think it should, actually. No, no."

So how have I mischaracterized him?

David Miller


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org>
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 10:41 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on Creationism


David:YIKES!! You mischaracterize both Williams and his position. DOUBLE
YIKES!! I know that you will continue to do so. You are truly trapped,
David. You've bound yourself with your own theology (not, as you believe,
Scripture). Your teachers will one day answer for what they've done to you
and, what you now do to others.Yikes! Yikes! Yikes (that'd be triple yikes)
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org>
Sent: March 22, 2006 10:25
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams on Creationism


> Lance wrote:
>> If Williams is a 'liberal loonie' then
>> you are a 'sectarian loonie' , David.
>
> I'm sectarian only in the sense that the holy and the profane ought to be
> separate.  I am not sectarian within the group of those who have submitted
> unto Jesus Christ as their Lord and Savior.
>
> Lance wrote:
>> He is a brother in Christ who believes
>> differently than you on some matters.
>> Now, if that makes him what you say
>> then, that makes you what I say.
>
> He is not a liberal loony for believing differently from me.  The moniker
> was offered because of his statement about how acknowledgement of our
> Creator did not belong in schools.  He made an irrational statement,
> assuming that CNN reported him accurately.  If he is a brother in Christ,
> then I expect to hear a retraction or clarification made soon as other
> believers correct him.  If he is not a brother in Christ, then he will
> continue to support the working of iniquity that seeks to remove the
> acknowledgment of God our Creator from the schools.  What he said was very
> damaging to our society, to believers who want to acknowledge God the
> Creator in their study of origins.  To think that science and the
> acknowledgement of God are incompatible is expected from scientists but
> not
> from theologians, and certainly not from the Right Reverend Doctor Rowland
> Williams, Archbishop of Canterbury.
>
> David Miller
>
> ----------
> "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may
> know how you ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6)
> http://www.InnGlory.org
>
> If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a
> friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
>


----------
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know 
how you ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6) 
http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a 
friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


----------
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know 
how you ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.

Reply via email to