2015-06-06 8:41 GMT+02:00 Cédric Krier <cedric.kr...@b2ck.com>: > On 05 Jun 19:52, Christophe (net) wrote: >> Le 05/06/2015 16:30, Cédric Krier a écrit : >> >On 05 Jun 14:46, Christophe (net) wrote: >> >>Le 05/06/2015 12:41, Cédric Krier a écrit : >> >>>On 05 Jun 09:14, Christophe (net) wrote: >> >>>>Hello >> >>>> >> >>>>We have written a little module that modifies the use of parties and >> >>>>addresses for : >> >>>> >> >>>> - Adding of the possibility to define a default address on party (this >> >>>>address does not need to show the name field) >> >>> >> >>>But there is already a default address on party (the first one). >> >> >> >>this module removes the ambiguity (nothing differentiates the first address >> >>of the other if not its position) and especially specifies that the other >> >>person addresses are identical to the primary address. >> > >> >Ordering for prioritisation is one of the biggest design principal of >> >Tryton. If you don't accept it, you will have to write a lot of modules >> >because it is everywhere. >> > >> >>>> - Adding the association between contact mechanism and addresses (on >> >>>> an >> >>>>idea of Zikzakmedia) >> >>> >> >>>I don't see the point to link for example an email to an address ? >> >> >> >>Not necessarily has an address but a person (name) who may have a different >> >>address or not the main address. >> > >> >A person is a party not a contact mechanism. >> >> These remarks puzzled me, because I thought the name of the address fields >> represented the person's name at this address, but I see in the doc that I >> was wrong. >> How you represent: >> - Your employees? > > They are parties linked to the company thanks to company.employee Model. > >> - The various contacts of a company? > > Parties with a relation (from party_relationship) to the company (also a > party). > >> - Companies and their subsidiaries? > > Idem but with a different kind relation > >> and after that how you easily find the information: >> - A contact owned a company? > > On the party form, there is a list of all relations. > >> - All of a company contacts? > > Idem as party_relationship create the reverse link automatically. > >> and how to send you a quote to a specific contact from the organization? > > For now, there is no module that addresses this need. > For me, we are missing in the std modules one that will add a contact > field (M2O to party.party) on the sale, sale_opportunity and purchase. > This field should have a domain that will restrict the selectable party > to some specific relations of the main party.
We've got sale_contact, sale_opportunity_contact, account_invoice_contact, purchase_contact and some others: https://bitbucket.org/nantic/profile/repositories?search=contact If there's interest we could work on pushing them to core. > > -- > Cédric Krier - B2CK SPRL > Email/Jabber: cedric.kr...@b2ck.com > Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 > Website: http://www.b2ck.com/ -- Albert Cervera i Areny Tel. 93 553 18 03 @albertnan www.NaN-tic.com
