2015-06-06 17:25 GMT+02:00 Christophe (net) <c...@adiczion.net>: > > > Le 06/06/2015 08:41, Cédric Krier a écrit : >> >> On 05 Jun 19:52, Christophe (net) wrote: >>> >>> Le 05/06/2015 16:30, Cédric Krier a écrit : >>>> >>>> On 05 Jun 14:46, Christophe (net) wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Le 05/06/2015 12:41, Cédric Krier a écrit : >>>>>> >>>>>> On 05 Jun 09:14, Christophe (net) wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hello >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We have written a little module that modifies the use of parties and >>>>>>> addresses for : >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - Adding of the possibility to define a default address on party >>>>>>> (this >>>>>>> address does not need to show the name field) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> But there is already a default address on party (the first one). >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> this module removes the ambiguity (nothing differentiates the first >>>>> address >>>>> of the other if not its position) and especially specifies that the >>>>> other >>>>> person addresses are identical to the primary address. >>>> >>>> >>>> Ordering for prioritisation is one of the biggest design principal of >>>> Tryton. If you don't accept it, you will have to write a lot of modules >>>> because it is everywhere. >>>> >>>>>>> - Adding the association between contact mechanism and addresses >>>>>>> (on an >>>>>>> idea of Zikzakmedia) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I don't see the point to link for example an email to an address ? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Not necessarily has an address but a person (name) who may have a >>>>> different >>>>> address or not the main address. >>>> >>>> >>>> A person is a party not a contact mechanism. >>> >>> >>> These remarks puzzled me, because I thought the name of the address >>> fields >>> represented the person's name at this address, but I see in the doc that >>> I >>> was wrong. >>> How you represent: >>> - Your employees? >> >> >> They are parties linked to the company thanks to company.employee Model. >> >>> - The various contacts of a company? >> >> >> Parties with a relation (from party_relationship) to the company (also a >> party). >> >>> - Companies and their subsidiaries? >> >> >> Idem but with a different kind relation >> >>> and after that how you easily find the information: >>> - A contact owned a company? >> >> >> On the party form, there is a list of all relations. >> >>> - All of a company contacts? >> >> >> Idem as party_relationship create the reverse link automatically. >> >>> and how to send you a quote to a specific contact from the organization? >> >> >> For now, there is no module that addresses this need. >> For me, we are missing in the std modules one that will add a contact >> field (M2O to party.party) on the sale, sale_opportunity and purchase. >> This field should have a domain that will restrict the selectable party >> to some specific relations of the main party. >> > > Ok, how do I differentiate the company from their contacts (if, for example, > I want to do a mail to all companies)? > Should I add a flag (is a company for exemple) ?
Yes. Categories are the usual way to distinguish this kind of things. > > -- > Christophe > http://adiczion.com -- Albert Cervera i Areny Tel. 93 553 18 03 @albertnan www.NaN-tic.com
