2014-05-09 19:07 GMT+02:00 Cédric Krier <cedric.kr...@b2ck.com>: > On 09 May 18:36, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote: >> 2014-05-09 18:13 GMT+02:00 Cédric Krier <cedric.kr...@b2ck.com>: >> > On 04 May 10:53, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote: >> >> Again, probably do not understand. Let's define the model. >> >> >> >> Do you want to add what your model would look like in the wiki and >> >> continue the discussion from there? >> > >> > I did not edit the wiki, I let you the authority. >> > Here is the design I have: >> >> Looks good to me in general. However I'd like to re-introduce the >> OperationType concept. Design and reason below: > > Ok so my answer is: > >> > >> > >> > class BOM: >> > operations = fields.One2Many() >> > >> > >> > class OperationTemplate: >> > bom = fields.Many2One() >> > sequence = fields.Integer() >> > time = fields.Float() >> > operator = fields.Selection(['linear', 'constant']) >> > asset_resources = fields.One2Many() >> > employee_resources = fields.One2Many() >> > >> > >> > class AssetResource: >> > product = fields.Many2One() >> > >> > >> > class EmployeResource: >> > group = fields.Many2One() >> > >> > >> > class Production: >> > operations = fields.One2Many() >> > >> > >> > class Operation: >> > production = fields.Many2One() >> > sequence = fields.Integer() > template = fields.Many2One()
The problem is that it makes the "route" part of the BOM less flexible. See your own answer when I proposed this here: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/tryton-dev/X5do2teK0mU/qP0Mw7oixM8J were you said "But it prevents evolution of the Route." Which I think was completely right. That's why I think OperationType is a better solution. >> > time = fields.Float() >> > assets = fields.One2Many() >> > employees = fields.One2Many() >> > >> > >> > class OperationAsset: >> > product = fields.Many2One() >> > lot = fields.Many2One() # Optional >> > >> > >> > class OperationEmployee: >> > group = fields.Many2One() >> > employee = fields.Many2One() # Optional >> >> The reason for adding OperationType is because it allows the same you >> have with a product. Let me explain: >> >> Currently you can design a BOM and start producing. During production >> employees introduce the real quantities of products consumed. This >> allows the manager later aggregate historic data to check if the >> planned quantities for each of the products were actually the >> quantities planned and so he can change the bom accordingly if needed. >> >> With operation type you can create the operations in the BOM and >> during production employees introduce the real time spent but if we >> just have a "description" we cannot make any analysis of where we're >> spending most of our time. We just know that a given machine or >> employee group is spending more time than expected but not doing what. > > -- > Cédric Krier - B2CK SPRL > Email/Jabber: cedric.kr...@b2ck.com > Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 > Website: http://www.b2ck.com/ -- Albert Cervera i Areny Tel. 93 553 18 03 @albertnan www.NaN-tic.com
