* Cédric Krier: " Re: [tryton] RfC: maning of new state of stock move" (Fri, 5 Dec 2014 12:07:54 +0100):
> On 05 Dec 11:57, Mathias Behrle wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I would like to pull a little bit of your attention to the following issue: > > > > For [1] there is coming a new state for stock moves, for which the current > > proposal [2] is 'None'. > > > > My point of view is: there shouldn't be a state of None. As soon as an > > object has a state, it has one and 'None' is misleading. This is different > > from selections, where you can can make a selection or not. > > I don't understand this thought. > state field can only have one of the value of the selection so there is > no misleading by naming one of the selection 'None'. A state of 'None' logically is not at all a state , so if choosen the state should disappear from the object. It would be way easier for our users to have a meaningful name instead of a logical clash. A selection is different. Not doing a selection is an empty selection. > > I proposed several alternatives: > > > > 'Preliminary', 'Preparative', 'Provisional', 'Tentative' > > > > What would be your prefered name just in case? > > > > Cheers, > > Mathias > > > > > > [1] https://bugs.tryton.org/issue4362 > > [2] http://codereview.tryton.org/5811002/diff/20001/CHANGELOG#newcode1 > -- Mathias Behrle MBSolutions Gilgenmatten 10 A D-79114 Freiburg Tel: +49(761)471023 Fax: +49(761)4770816 http://m9s.biz UStIdNr: DE 142009020 PGP/GnuPG key availabable from any keyserver, ID: 0x8405BBF6
pgphv026qRm0N.pgp
Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP
